Showing posts with label contextualisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label contextualisation. Show all posts

Friday, 5 June 2009

Parkinson 2008 emotions direct and indirect interaction

Parkinson, B. (2008)

Emotions in direct and remote social interaction:  Getting through the spaces between us

Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1510-1529

 

Mostly a theoretical paper whose overall intention p1512 ‘to clarify the ways in which emotion interlock with other psychological and social processes in ‘real’ and ‘virtual’ distributed social arrangements’.

Authors’ s view of emotion –p1512 ‘ emotions are episodic modes of evaluative engagement with the social and practical world rather than simply responses to events’ As defined it differs from an attitude in the way that it lacks the durability of the latter.

 

(Parkinson, 2005) p1518 ‘emotion expressions achieve their communicative meaning in the dynamic context of their use and have no one to one correspondence to underlying emotional states’ and supports this by the following argument p1518 ‘ For example, faces thought to be direct expressions of one emotion may be interpreted as indications of another when presented in other contexts (Carroll & Russell, 1996) – KRO need to follow this up and question it

 

Phrases

P1510 ‘calibrating their presentation with other people’s responses’

P1511in online environments ‘ context-based interpretations may become miscalibrated and ineffective’

P1511 ‘ information loss opens up the opportunity for selective emphasis or concealment’ 

 

Theoretical background – Emotion as relational alignment

Relation-alignment perspective  (Parkinson, Fischer & Manstead (2005)– p1511 ‘which formulates emotions as modes of engagement with the social (and practical) world’   and has the underlying assumption ‘ many of our emotions are intrinsically attuned to the actual, anticipated, or imagined reactions of others’ rather than as an essentially private experience. Parkinson argues that the emotional experience gains meaning because of with interactions with others. P1515 ‘ emotions serve to influence others……. By inducing moment-by-moment adjustments in relational stances’ ‘ emotion exerts an effect because interactants know how the emotional episode is meant to unfold’

Uses anger as an example emotion ‘ the course of anger episodes depends on the dynamic availability of different kinds of interpersonal feedback’ but context is relevant ‘ real time anger episodes encourage direct non verbal adjustment whereas remote context rely on ‘shared and negotiable emotion scripts’

Sees development of emotion from the unconscious response to a triggers in childhood (prereflective) to one orientated to an emotional script as determined by society/culture (articulated).  In this way p1513 ‘ the implicit ( prereflective) and explicit (articulated) modes of anger often interpenetrate during adult interaction, but the balance between them varies’

 

Emotion reciprocation as part of relational alignment

P1514 ‘the other person’s interlocking role in the relational process also needs to be considered’ the other will adopt a relational position.  p1514 -1515 it may be that ‘interactants approach the emotion’s object from different angles and end up in discrepant emotional stances however there are also many circumstances in which interpersonal emotions converge to arrive at a shared mode of engagement’ e.g. social referencing between carer and child

 

P1515

‘one of the advantages of prereflective non verbal communication is that it is not always susceptible to the turn taking conventions of verbal dialogue.  Two or more people’s emotions may influence each other continually over time, rather than there being a back-and-forth exchange of emotional information’ – ‘ mediated communication may disallow this mode of operation’

 

Effect of mode of contact – channel constraints

 

Note: table on p1517 as an orientating framework

P1516 considers ‘ the emotional implications of signals and actions that are misinterpreted because differences in perspectives are not adequately factored in’

Influential factors include,

  1. medium (modality availability, sequentiality, temporal resolution) note effects of uncertainty of reception, absence of immediate feedback
  2. relational (calibration of contexts, relationship)
  3. task

 

context  and illusions of transparency

Gilovich et al (1998) argue p1519 ‘ that people suffer from an illusion of transparency leading them to believe that there emotions are more detectable than they really are’ ‘ the illusion operates most strongly when there is increasing remoteness between the interactants’ therefore ‘ a general sense may develop that others are not appropriately acknowledging and responding to one’s own emotional state’ i.e. miscommunication or miscalibration due to the limitation on prereflective adjustment

 

Uses anger while driving to illustrate the points made in this paragraph

‘ the apparent intensification of anger presentations that take place when interactions take place between drivers arise partly because a remote medium of calibration and communication is treated as transparent and directly analogous to the kinds of face to face interactions that occur when people are in close proximity to each other’

 

Timing

Parkinson & Lea work on effects of timing lags.

P1522 ‘ Chartrand & Bargh (1999)  ‘demonstrated that mirroring another person’s movement results in smoother interaction and liking for the other person.  Furthermore precisely matching the timing of the other can contribute to the development of shared effect’ Bernieri & Law (1991) ‘have suggested that people engaged in face-to-face interaction may establish rapport by implicitly synchronising their gestures and expression with one another’

 

Channel constraints and compensating or even exploiting them for them

Constraints:

-  Reduction in social cues ( Rutter, 1987)

-  Perceptions of interpersonal contact (social presence) Short et al, 1976 leads to flaming -  Keisler et al, 84, Sroull & Keisler, 1986) p1523 ‘ it has been suggested that the omission of nonverbal cues that might otherwise disambiguate senders’ intentions may lead to misinterpretations and extreme reactions.’ 

 

Compensations:  disadvantage is not an inevitable consequence of reduced channels because what has gone missing for senders has also gone missing for receivers and p1524 ‘so might be exploited as an advantage’

‘ reworking articulated representations of how emotion is communicated in different communicative contexts helps to alleviate negative effects’

Parkinson suggests emoticons (‘an explicit signal to substitute for prereflective emotion’’ to disambiguate and therefore avoid miscalibration and therefore behaviours like flaming. KRO- but that assumes that it has the same influence which of course stems from his approach to emotion.

 

illusion of transparency   Satvitsky & Gilovich (2003) suggest raising awareness of this illusion in online contexts p1523 ‘ allowed them to appreciate the possibilities for concealing their anxieties from others’

 

also p1523 research from a social identity perspective suggests that a relative lack of social cues can also lead to more than less normative behaviour when the salience of personal identity is low (personally anonymous communication) but the salience of social identity ( group membership) is high ( Lea & Spears, 1991)’

 

Strategic presentation of emotion

 

P1525 ‘ is it real  (KRO – hasn’t really addressed what he means by real in this article )or simulated emotion that is being presented by the strategist?’ “One answer is that its dynamic attunement to other people’s responses may make it more real over time.  An idea supported by evidence from emotional labour research

 

Strategic presentation and emotional labour

Hochschild (1983) and effects on air craft crew ‘ If I pretend I’m feeling really up, sometimes I actually cheer up and feel friendly’ Instructing air hostesses to pretend that they are in their own living room p1525 ‘ in terms of relation alignment approach, this kind of emotion work means deliberately applying an articulated emotion-relevant script to a situation that would normally have other emotional implications’ Without  ‘real’ context and social cues it may be easier to reformulate our relations with others (imaginative projection)  and may explain how it is possible to be a debt collector or military person.

Thursday, 22 January 2009

The Rashomon Effect

The Rashomon Effect
Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of contested events.
Roth W.D. & Mehta J.D.(2002)
Sociological Methods and Research, vol 31, no 2 

The points made in this article are illustrated by two case studies both based on school shootings in the USA.  Generational status , uncovered by the interpretivist  approach was  a hidden yet  highly important data point.  At the same time, good interpretivist work is informed by factual understanding in a broader context.

Case studies used to illustrate the value of 
critical events
rare events
can cause problems for causal relationships , retrospective, often highly charged
contested events 
in the context of combined ( positivist and
interpretivist approach)
'can use the same data but treat the multiple and conflicting explanations of events as data points' -  and then use these to evaluate what the nature of the dispute ( contested aspect) reveals 
'interpretivist analysis of the community helps us understand the actions of its members, it may enable us to use a positivist approach to answer questions about the causes of contested events'
problems for gathering accurate data - memory, vested interest, mistaken judgements  can all bias positivist research -awareness of these problems is important.  the respondent's 'world view' and 'values' is also a form of bias but in the interpretevist hands can be illuminating- understanding how an individual may uphold an interpretation of events that support a belief system.
privilege data that are less likely to be subject to known sources of bias
memory bias can be  checked with any relevant written documentation of the event being researched.

 contextually informed triangulation & interpretively informed triangulation  
in positivist research
Consider the participant response in light of everything known about the source of their knowledge & triangulating among various respondents and sources  are useful strategies to counteract or minimise the effect of biased responses .  Use as many viewpoints as possible as a way of triangulating.  Weight the information available from different sources.
In terms of a positivist approach ' find out not only what the respondent knows but how they know it'  relationships can be a another source of bias.
interpretivist
conflicting responses collected  from critical events provide key data points for interpretivists  that can help us understand social meanings and underlying divisions in the communities that are studied. It all helps the analytical leverage.
balancing accounts from different participants and therefore perspectives.
combining positivism and interpretivist approach
using conflicting responses to factual questions ( positivist approach) can help uncover previously hidden social structures.
What were problems of data quality for the positivist become valuable  data points for interpretivism.



combining a positivist and interpretivist approach
''possible to simultaneously accept that there is both a single objective truth of factual events and multiple subjective views'
positivist and interpretivist are not necessarily at odds
when managing data bias  the key is to 'construct factual questions that limit people's abilities to pontificate or state opinions instead of facts'
an iterative approach between positivism and interpretivism is recommended.  'An understanding of the local webs of significance alters how positivist research is conducted; yet the positivist inquiry can also show us where those webs of significance lie'
  • positivist - cause & effect
require replicability
expected to lead to general laws
involves hypothesis testing
looks for explanatory power and parsimony
  • Interpretivist
reveals hidden aspects of a community 
thick description helps to address questions of validity.
allow complex and nuanced understanding  and can help to identify subgroups

a contested event as a cultural breach
'an atypical event that is controversial can serve as a breach of the social norms of a community'  Sometimes this a used as a technique; simple social norms are sometimes violated so as to observe the reactions of the participants.
 
see Table 3 page 163

ref  good for interplay between positivism and interpretivism
Newman, K.S. (1988) Falling from Grace: The Experience of downward mobility in the American middle class.  New York: Free Press.