Monday 30 September 2013

H-J 2010


Harmon-Jones, Gable, P.A., Peterson, C.S.
The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion related phenomena. A review and update
Biological Psychology, 84, 451- 462

Greater left than right neural activity ( defined as reduced alpha power) associated with positive affect ( approach/no approach) behaviours.

Carotid Amytal, rTMS, findings interpreted as losing inhibitory influences of the affected hemisphere. Hemisphere specialisation evidenced by asymmetry in neural activation, right versus left as the DV, usually assessed by EEG specifically alpha power (KRO but see Davidson 1988 for the conceptual difference between hemisphere specialisation and hemisphere activation and how the two need not be related)

Methodological issues
State variables-environmental e.g. Time of day and time of year influences on cortisol levels may explain disparate findings about trait influences.

Manipulations of emotion, p 454 'some may not  evoke sufficient emotional intensity to engage asymmetrical frontal activations for all individuals' , ' Moreover, the intermixing of multiple types of affective stimuli may weaken motivational affects'

Measuring motivational direction. Motivational direction can be measured by using behavioral inhibition/activation system scales BIS/BAS of Carver and White (1994).

Motivational intensity can be potentiated by trait, and the opportunity to act. Led to experiments comparing supine and upright whilst Ps were given insulting feedback. Frontal activations diminished when supine. This finding has implications for the choice of technique ..          .     ,  . .   .  , .  ,    . ...
, fMRI ( when Ps need to be supine) and EEG(when they do not).

Gross & Levinson  (blinking associated with anger due to emotion suppression activity)

Manipulations
Neurofeedback
Used with AHSD by monitoring theta and alpha levels
In experimental settings Ps have been trained by 'rewarding' or 'not' with tones of differing frequency. 32 minutes training per day, feedback every 2 seconds. One group trained to increase relative right. Then zygomatic and corrugated monitored while  Ps watched films . The relative right group produced more corrugater.

P453 ' this research suggests that asymmetric frontal cortical activity is casually involved in emotional responses'

Hand contractions
Hand and face contractions activate contralateral hemisphere and in turn lead to spreading activation in that hemisphere and therefore alpha suppression is the consequence. tested and affirmed by  comparing uni lateral hand contractions (4 mins) then  Ps watched a mildly positive approach -orientated radio editorial while EEG recorded  Then an attitude scale used to measure motivation?

Guilt
'Does asymmetric frontal cortical activity fluctuate in response to motivational intensity changes?' ' guilt is hypothesised to serve two functions that operate in temporal sequence' (Amodio et al , 2007). Guilt first causes a reduction in approach motivation once one is aware of having committed a social transgression.  This reaction is followed by an increase in approach motivation when one is presented with an opportunity to engage in behaviour to repair the transgression.

P458
Motivational intensity cf valence
Events vary in their impact ie motivational intensity
Do positive(valence) affects of any approach motivational intensity cause increase in relative left frontal activation.
The Mindset experiment
3 conditions
1.  High approach positive valence (the P' s actions lead to positive outcome)
2.  Low approach positive valence ( the positive is produced by someone else but the P benefits)
3.  Neutral
Result alpha asymmetry 1>2>3

Source location studies
Using alpha power as the DV left frontal dorsal lateral is associated with approach motivation

EEG v fMRI/PET
P 459 'Each technique may assess different populations of neurons. EEG signals result from very selective areas of current source activity, often corresponding to small subsets of total synaptic action in tissue volumes and largely independent of action potentials. PET/fMRI measures, in contrast, result from activity in areas requiring much hemodynamic/metabolic activity. For example, cortical stelate cells occupy roughly spherical volumes and their synaptic sources provide a " closed field" structure which makes them invisible to the EEG.    Although stellar cells contribute only 15% of the neural population they contribute disproportionally to cortical metabolic activity. Thus they have a large effect on fMRI and PET. Other cases yield strong EEG signals and weak fMRI/PET activity. EEG can be large when only a few percent of neurons in each column are "synchronously active", if a large-scale synchrony among different columns produces a large dipole in which individual columns tend to be phase locked in particular frequencies. In this case, because most neurons in each intra-column population are relatively inactive, there is minimal metabolic activity'


Other
P459
' Posterior cortical regions are asymmetrically involved in emotional perception' right parietal and right temporal parietal , as measured by alpha power !!!!!!! Even in sensory areas
p459
' the research has suggested the importance of delineating emotional experience from emotional expression and emotional valence from motivational intensity'