Tuesday 26 February 2013

Shen et al (2009) notes


Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009)
Affective e-Learning using "emotional" data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment
Educational technology & Society, 12, 2, 176-189

p 176 'Pervasive leaning is supported by wireless communication and wearable computing'

p 176, 177 Affective computing ' computer methods that are related to, derived from or deliberately designed to influence emotions. It involves two areas: emotion synthesis used to artificially imitate some of the physical or behavioural explosions associated with affective states , and emotion analysis which is often employed in decision making for interactive systems' e.g. synthesis (robots) analysis (monitoring).

 Theoretical background
' according to Fowler (1997) study, the relationship between learning performance and the arousal is a type of inverted -U curve, and people learn best when their emotions are at a moderate optimal arousal level'

Circumflex model (arousal, valence)

OCC model - cognitive appraisal model for emotions. 22 emotion categories to goals, relevant events, actions of an agent, attitudes of attractive or unattractive objects..........

Kort's Learning spiral model a state of evolution model Kort, Reilly and Picard (2001). p 180 proposed a four quadrant learning spiral model in which emotions change while the learner moves through quadrants and up the spiral. In quadrant 1 the learner  is experiencing positive affect and constructing knowledge. At this point, the learner is working through the material with ease. Once discrepancies arise between the learner's knowledge he moves to Q2 which consists of constructive knowledge and negative effect. Affect as  confusion. If this is not resolved learner may move to Q3 , frustration. If any misconceptions get discarded then moves onto Q4 'unlearning and positive affect' then propelled back to Q1 looking for new learning.

In Affective computing detection rates for non verbal cues is about 80%  therefore
' because physiological signals are more difficult to conceal or manipulate ....... And potentially less intrusive to text and measure, they are a more reliable representation of inner feelings '

Affective e-Learning model
Use two sets of data
1.     Collected Biophysical data HR, Skin conductance, BP, EEG. Incorporates elements from Circumflex - to describe biophysical in terms of  learner's emotions ( interest,  engagement, confusion, frustration, boredom, hopefulness, satisfaction, disappointment)
2.  OCC cognitive appraisal model for emotions.  considers contextual information of the learner and the learning setting. Infers learner emotions from this data

So in this model 1 represents the emotional states and 2 the appraisal mechanism . Assumes appraisal leads to emotions which in turn are reflected biologically. A Baysian method was used to model the relations between the emotional states and their causal variables.


Method
One subject, 20 trials, 40 minute biophysical recordings while student studies for examination in otherwise ,normal context. Self paced learning

EEG 3 electrodes, PCz, A1,A2.

Proposed Outcome of the system:  generates responses to the learner p181 ' based on his/her emotional states, cognitive abilities, and learning goals.'
 This model can also be used to customise the interaction between the learner and learning system, to predict learner responses to system behaviour, and to predict learner's future interaction with the learning system'

Results
Tested user satisfaction by comparing the number of  user adjustments required for the 'emotion aware' system v  a 'non emotion aware system' latter required more users interventions

Adding EEG moved best classification rate ( for emotional involvement) from 68.1 to 86.3%. P 187 ' this suggests the close relationship between brain waves and emotions during learning'