Monday 25 February 2013

Saxe (2006) notes


Rebecca Saxe (2006)
Uniquely human social cognition
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 235-239

Foundational capacities are the only aspects  of human social cognition  that are not uniquely human they are shared by preverbal infants , apes and monkeys

   Recognise co specifics
   Monitor others' actions
   Engage in contingent interactions
   Understand  basic mental states such as goals and actions (apes and preverbal children (see also  Meltzoff & Decety, 2003) for preverbal children)

What aspects of social cognition are uniquely human?
However, apes and monkeys  and very young infants do not have the following two social cognition  competences
 1. Theory of Mind ( Temporo-parietal junction TPJ)
P235 being able to ' distinguish between the object of a mental state
 what a person's mental state is about , the state of affairs to which the belief or perceptions refers) and the content. (How that state of affairs is represented, what the person believes or perceives to be true of it). KRO for project work the object, state of affairs would be  the task and the understanding that group cohesion needs to be maintained in order to make progress with the task. 'Command of this distinction enables older children to understand how people's mental representations of the world might differ from the way the world really is' KRO or that it differs from their own understanding of it   I.e. Saxe ( shown as italics) would extend the 2003 definition by Meltzoff & Decety ' To become a sophisticated mentalist one needs to analyse both the similarities and differences between one's own states and those of others' as they refer to an object,state of affairs

2.  Joint attention (medial prefrontal cortex MPFC) - mental representations with a three place (triadic) structure ie triadic social relations
'This second unique component of human social cognition requires an individual to represent  triadic relations 'You, and Me, collaboratively looking at, working on or talking about This'

Saxe is discussing these theories  in terms of the physical presence of an intentional actor.

Foundational stages are the first steps when reasoning about others' actions.
1.  Detecting the presence of an intentional actor
 (Extrastriate body area (EBA)). A region in bilateral occipito-temporal cortex that shows a selective response to human bodies and body parts, relative to other familiar objects. Right specialised for perceiving others). Verbal stories about the human body do not suffice.
2. Interpreting the motions of a human body in terms of the person's goals
Posterior Superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), usually right lateralised, recruited both during direct observation and indirect observation of the results of the action.  I.e. it represents the relationship between a movement and its context.  For simple goal directed actions, the response in r. pSTS is increased when there is a mismatch between the action and the target an an action
Representing the specific (representational) contents of mental states such as beliefs
Temporo-parietal junction , adjacent to but distinct from the pSTS
EP236 ' the BOLD response in this region is high when subjects read stories that describe a character's true or false beliefs but low during stories containing other information about a character, including appearance, cultural background, or even internal, subjective sensations .....that have no representational content'
 this region is also recruited 'for determining how the spatial relations between two objects would appear from a character's point of view versus from the subjects's own position'
3.  Reasoning (the sophisticated end of social cognition) about mental states
Recent imaging work has reconstructed the knowledge base on this ie MPFC not the unique neural substrate of reasoning about mental states
 p 236 ' No part of the MPFC is specifically recruited for reasoning about representational mental states' ( ie beliefs) 'instead subregions are implicated in distinct components of social cognition'  Two areas involved ventral and dorsal, distinctiveness supported by double dissociations (neuropsychological evidence)
Ventral MPFC affective empathy and sympathy (supported by evidence collected using a variety of method)
Saxe  p 237 definition of emotional empathy  based on Blair 'the cognitive and neural processes that produce a congruent emotion in the observer in response to others' directly perceived emotional displays or to descriptions of others' emotion-laden experiences'
Dorsal MPFC  implicated in ' shared or collaborative attention and goals, that is triadic relations between Me, You and This