Wednesday, 20 October 2010

Learning by watching

Terry Mayes, Finbar Dineen, Jean McKendree and John Lee (2002)

Learning from Watching others Learn

In

Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues

Christine Steeples and Chris Jones (Eds)

Springer, London

Theoretical background

Vicarious learning cf Bandura

Study led them from FAQs and other specific subject matter to p214 ‘more generalized benefits, for the vicarious learner, of seeing how to engage in learning dialogues’

Mayes ‘learning as a by product of comprehension’

McKendree et al (1998) ‘dialogue central to the learners ‘enculturation’ as well as the learning itself. i.e. p215 ‘ a higher level of alignment. The learner acquires a new set of norms and procedures’ and has led to a model of how to behave as a successful learner.

The studies

P218

A study in the context of students preparing syntactic trees.

2 conditions

1. animated diagram

2. animated diagram together with a dialogue

Condition 2 gave the best results

KRO Is vicarious or imitation learning an appropriate tool for construction of understanding.

P223

A specifically designed study, students financially rewarded for outcome – ‘when students engage in discussions themselves, we find those who have seen vicarious resources have been modelling the tasks and language seen in them’ when listening to exemplar dialogues they are overhearers. (KRO lurkers in CMC)

Comment

P224

‘Stenning et al (2000) have provided an account about what aspects of educational dialogue make it particularly amenable to capture and re-use for overhearers e.g. show rather than just tell ( KRO another word for modelling)

led to a situation where ‘the authority of the tutor is largely abrogated in favour of the more abstract authority of ‘reasoning norms’ – KRO a method that could be used to engender all sorts of reasoning norms.

P225

‘in most educational settings the rules which govern overhearing are well understood and form part of the experience of learning as a member of the group.’

Why would new learners want to access previous dialogue? What motivates? ‘ will depend on the potency of the identification that the new learner can develop for the original participants and the extent to which the dialogue is considered relevant to the achievement of the learners goal …… success depends on ‘extent to which the original participants in the dialogue are seen as representative members of a target CoP’

Being a learner involves ‘ constructing an identity in relation to the community’

CoP ‘not a description of learning per se, or how people learn together. It provides a very high level design heuristic and in that sense it tells us where we should start looking for design principles which address the key question of motivation.

Look up Fowler and Mayes (1999) and ideas of learning relationships.

Gibson 2006

Gibson, W., Hall, A. and Callery, P. (2006)

'Topicality and the Structure of Interactive Talk in Face-to-face Seminar Discussions - Implications for Research in Distributed Learning Media',

British Journal of Educational Research 32(1), 77-94.

Theorertical background

Stokoe reference to topic development. ( Stokoe apparently sees affordance in a cultural sense)

‘how do people interactionally negotiate topics’ comes from questions such as ‘ how do ‘societal members produce a sense of social order through orientation to normative intersubjectively recognizable features of talk’

work so far has tended to focus on turn taking. Of particular interest is p791 ‘conversational topics become connected through members ‘ orientations towards topic’ which has led to a research method whereby you consider how apparently unrelated utterances are linked – only problem is that the links are potentially limitless.

Stokoe used these ideas and came up with

· False first – off topic

· Teacher effect – provide some structural features, e.g. define discussion task, justify limits and orientate immediate context.

KRO – but in asynchronous there are several concurrent topics.

P91 the ‘interactive turn negotiation process placed topicality in continual flux the context of the talk was significantly shaped by the nature of the interaction process’

P92 ‘ G claims that ‘the lack of simultaneous participation has posed a barrier to the creation of interactive task. As yet, however, clear specification of the type of interaction that is required/desired from such environments has yet to be effected’ Even quite high profile interactional models often fail to state what they mean by ‘interactive discussion’

transistions and emotional labour

Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V.E., Hounsell, J., and McCune, V. (2007)

‘ A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: lear ning to be a university student,

Online Paper Series: GEO-033

online papers archived by the Institute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:45HYVX2FvTUJ:www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/1891/1/hchristie002.pdf+Community+of+Practice+and+emotion&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi0Y0plmFCc7_w7Ne2IwEW53NaLUvauuzXGc0J60-SR9aaiLhZnU9R7HgcOwwbBGU1IIK0m69EkPjTyBlETEv1ei3-4YSgsvv2axlfaNq6KYXjdz-KpFRXeyJRAZevcqNE89gX2&sig=AHIEtbQ8NX5aJ5GiMr8ZDQQ1sp4L-1oe4A

http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/1891/1/hchristie002.pdf.

Longditudinal study of students moving from FE to an elite university.

P5 Despite (Gibbs 1992, Kolb 1984, Rogers 1975) ‘the literature has remarkably little to say about the emotional dimensions of learning ( Brown 2000, Boler 1999). There is little investigation of the emotional impulse to learning – of the difference that confidence, motivation, perseverance and creativity make to the individual’s wider disposition to learning, or the potential changes in learning identities.’

P6 Moving beyond theories that focus on individual cognitive abilities and processes

Lave and Wenger (1991) –‘theory of situated learning’ - ‘seeks to explain changes in learning practices when individuals become exposed to new influences and new situations’ learning as participation in social practice. ‘From this perspective significant learning is what changes our ability to engage in practice and to understand why we do it. Such learning has to do with the development of our practices and our ability to negotiate meaning’

P8

The paper considers ‘ the ways in which emotional processes underpin and become entangled with the social process of learning’ emotional labour involved in belonging to a project group.

The Study

Longitudinal over 3-4 years. Students entering an elite University from FE college. Interviews 2 in the first year.

‘Although not questioned directly about the emotional aspects of their learning experience, this emerged as an important theme in their interview data’

Ist interview at the beginning of the semester p9 ‘strong sense of exhilaration and excitement’ (Christie et al, 2006) few reported the same in the second round of interviews ‘p10 ‘ some students found the changes horrendous and stressful others thought ‘it was a rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’ and many described themselves at best ‘coping’ due to ‘learning shock’ p11 during the first semester ‘ differences had to be identified and the respondents learn how to be university students’ the loss of the familiar ‘ the effort students put in to learning to find their way about the campus and the potentially disclocating effects of this, should not be under-estimated’ p12 ‘ unfamiliarity with protocol and procedure, and the emotional insecurity it engendered, was a recurrent feature of the students’ account of transition’

Comment on findings

P14 ‘Accounts which privilege the rational dimensions of learning stress that expertise and learning competence are located in the individual and are independent of context’ “relying on a rational approach to learning misses the existence of ‘embedded’ or ‘tacit’ knowledge which resides in systemic routines and formal procedures’ “ Following Lave and Wenger (1991) our analysis suggests that to undertake ‘significant learning’ the students had to change their ability to participate in the social practices of learning.’

P16 ‘Our evidence suggests two ways in which the emotional processes of learning were entangled in the creation of new communities of practice. First, students developed new ways of learning: and secondly, these changes in practices and the identity work they undertook helped them to develop a sense of belonging to and membership of the wider learning community’

“Only be recognizing difference could they begin to engage with the new learning environment and begin to make it familiar, understandable and usable’

p20 ‘Membership generally was perceived as involving two aspects: first, participating in the social practices to do with learning: and secondly, participating in the social practices to do with student life’ p21 ‘emotional commitment to studying was a central factor in motivating and enabling them to create new ways of participating in a community of practice and in the process transform understanding of the community itself’

p24 ‘ We have shown that engagement with learning is a subjective experience bound up with other life events and experiences ‘

p26 ‘moving to a different learning environment brings new sets of risks and uncertainties because the students must negotiate the meaning and significance of the everyday practices embodied in the new learning setting. Being and becoming a successful learner is as much about the social and emotional, as well as the cognitive dimensions of learning.’ “Whilst it is important for universities to be concerned with the quality of their teaching programmes, the interactive, social and collaborative aspects of students’ learning experiences, captured in the accounts of the social situatedness of learning, are also important determinants of graduate outcomes’

Important references

Griffiths, S., Winstanley, D. and Gabriel, Y. (2005) Laerning shock: the trauma of return to formal learning Management Learning 36(3): 275-297.

Christie, H. , Munro, M., and Wager, F. (2005) /Day students’ in higher education: widening access students and successful transitions to university life.

International Studeis in Sociology of Education 15(1): 3-29.